peter ruckman造句
例句與造句
- Such people include Gail Riplinger, Peter Ruckman, and others.
- Some eyes are needed on the Peter Ruckman article.
- In the Peter Ruckman article, the fact that Ruckman is twice divorced is sourced to the following footnote here.
- One of its most vocal, prominent and thorough proponents was Peter Ruckman, whose followers were generally known as Ruckmanites.
- Like his father, Peter Ruckman demonstrated artistic talent early in life, and he often illustrated his sermons in chalk and pastels while preaching.
- It's difficult to find peter ruckman in a sentence. 用peter ruckman造句挺難的
- It resulted in " no consensus " Wikipedia : Articles for deletion / Peter Ruckman, with people who wanted to keep saying it has a lot of google hits.
- In Singapore, the Far Eastern Bible College, led by Dr . Jeffrey Khoo, is a staunch defender of the King James Bible, but clearly distinguishes itself from Peter Ruckman and his views.
- Ironically, Peter Ruckman, a BJU graduate, has argued the most extreme version of the KJV-only position, that all translations of the Bible since the KJV have been of satanic origin.
- Johnson denounced certain King James Only advocates such as Jack Hyles, Peter Ruckman, and William Grady, who espouse " advanced revelation " or " re-inspiration " views of the King James Version of the Bible.
- Evangelical scholars and pastoral leaders critical of inclusive language translations include John F . MacArthur, J . I . Packer, Jack T . Chick, Gail Riplinger, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Texe Marrs, Wayne Grudem, Peter Ruckman, D . James Kennedy, Josh McDowell, R . Albert Mohler, Jr ., John Piper, Pat Robertson, R . C . Sproul, and Joni Eareckson Tada.
- The King James Version ( or Authorized Version ) of the English Bible which in our time has no equal amongst all of the other English translations is a true, faithful, and accurate translation of the two providentially preserved Texts so that we can with rejecting the inspired version, advanced revelation, and super superiority position of Peter Ruckman and Gail Riplinger confidently hold up the Authorized Version of 1611 and say This is the WORD OF GOD ! while realizing that we must in some verses go back to the underlying original language Texts ( i . e ., the Traditional Masoretic Hebrew Text and the Traditional Received Greek Text ) for complete clarity, and also compare Scripture with Scripture.